
Dear TT Community family,
We are looking for an individual investor to introduce to the world "The-State-Of-The-Art-Technology In Producing Electricity Without Using Burning Fossil Fuels Or Nuclear Reactors."
Just for general information on the latest facts update by WHO: Closed to two billion people today or almost one third of the planet still live in darkness because their homes do not have electricity.
In Africa and Latin America, millions survive on less than US$2 a day. And while the 21st century is called the "Age Of Knowledge", some 115 million children today are still too poor to go to school.
( With The Introduction Of "NuEnergy", Imagine The World Without Poverty.)
"NuEnergy" is " The Latest State-Of-The-Technology" in producing electricity without using nuclear reactors or burning fossil fuels or nuclear nor any alternative form of energy such as bio-diesel and etc. It is purely clean and it does not produce any greenhouse gas or other air polllution. It also does not generate any waste products that might need special handling or disposal because it is "Carbon Free."
Among the special features and absolute advantage in NuEnergy is that it does not cost a lot of money. An average, the cost for NuEnergy operations and maintenance is extremely minimal and/or next to zero, which is incomparable to the cost of a nuclear or a fossil fuels powered facility. That's not including fuel costs.
Installation.
NuEnergy can be installed in any areas regardless of weather or climate condition, and with or without enclosure.
Maintenance Facts.
NuEnergy has been designed for highly economical and cheap maintenance and/or at negligible costs. It is guaranteed not costly to install and it is not at all unsightly.
NuEnergy Usage.
NuEnergy, through the combine application of generators, turbines and other mechanical/electrical devices produces electricity through using of natural air surrounding us.
Since NuEnergy is running on natural air or "Air-Powered" . Therefore, the more generators and turbines use, the more air is absorbed and more system output is gained- meaning abundance or unlimited and continous supply of electricity is produced.
With NuEnergy, assuming a 12 mph (5.4 m/s) of air or wind will produce as much as 500 kWh per.month. That is enough energy to power the average California home, USA .
Once installed on a mass scale, NuEnergy could eventually capture more energy endlessly in a month than any oil rich nation can produce in the next 50 yrs.
This technological breakthrough will benefit every nation and it's people as it provides a continous and an abundance of electricity which will replace and/or supplement the existing methods used to produce electricity. NuEnergy is able to produce flows of electricity of up to 10 gigawatts and beyond- "It's Unlimited."
And the enormous benefits of using NuEnergy technology are:
1). Generate cost savings amounting to billions of US$ dollars in terms of
electricity and water usage, apart from conserving natural resources.
2). Help every country to generate US$billions of dollars in revenues.
3). Provide and/or create business and jobs opportunities in the country.
4). Generates tremendous economic growth, particularly in the industrial,
agricultural, tourism and commercial sectors.
5). Improve the standard of living apart from deepening global economic
integration in a way that leads to reduction in poverty and social-economic disparities, thereby contributes to narrowing the developing gap within and across the nations worldwide.
6). Reduction in the level of air-pollution to it's lowest level and thereby
generates a clean and healthy environment.
7). Opportunity to carry out R&D on the use of NuEnergy technology on
land and sea transportation such as public transport, buses, cars, lorries, trains, ships and etc. soon after this technological breakthrough is utilised worldwide.
( With the application of NuEnergy, power grid or electric utility companies
can afford to offer consumers at a very much lower energy cost compares to burning fossil fuels, gas, steam, coal, wind-powered energy or nuclear reactors and etc.)
Hopefully this new technology could be blessing for all beings and will help increasing the quality of life for all of us.
For further details or appointment, pls contact Michael Liang at [email protected]
Thank you.
This is exactly the kind of thing that we need! One thing that's clear is that without clean, cheap energy, the lives of nearly everyone on earth are going to be drastically altered. Please keep us updated!
8-D
Apparently you are proposing some form of wind power for slow-moving wind (12 mph) is that right? Are you proposing an open-source type technology model for your endeavor?
I had a friend a few years back who'd developed a small turbine with his dad. I never saw the thing in person but he lent me a CD that had some pics and a short film that made it look pretty slick. It wasn't very big - about the size of one of those office refrigerators or a little smaller. It was quiet and produced enough juice to light and power a barn. Plus, it was collapsible, so it could be mailed in a small carton. Don quit to work on this with his dad, but I never heard anything after that. We'd talked about using a 12- or 24-volt wiring harness, using an inverter and a bank of golf-cart batteries, to power a house. This is something I'd really like to see done. If we were to convert our lights and small appliances to 12-volt DC, we'd save a huge amount not only individually, but also wear and tear on our aging and vulnerable infrastructure.
You need some kind of power source, whether it be a Minto wheel, solar, wind or whatever. Zero-point would be grand, if we ever get that far. The best bang for the buck seems to be 24-volt golf cart batteries for storing energy, and a good inverter is worth what it costs. Now that we have good LEDs, we don't really need light bulbs at all. Did you know that the EPA has pages of instructions on what to do if one of those new curly fluorescent bulbs breaks? You're supposed to use gloves and a mask, sweep up the glass, bag it, hose down the area and call the hazmat people. Not only that, but all fluorescent lights contain a step-down transformer that reduces the voltage anyway! LEDs use practically no power, last for decades, and don't waste energy as heat. Also, fiber-optic cables can pump sunlight into any room. There are some good deals out there on surplus fiber-optic cable.
There are so many good ideas out there...once the OP of exploitation is finally out of the way, we'll see all kinds of innovations. While I'm not sure I can realistically forsee a day when there will be no medium of exchange at all, I think some of the points made on the Love-Or-Money forum are valuable, in that they point to a new attitude about being productive and offering our ideas on the marketplace. I agree that the NP will encourage giving and sharing as well as barter. It'll take a lot, though, for the idea of money to disappear. Even here, we've seen how the idea of a person's intrinsic worth to the community stubbornly refuses to divorce from money. As New World communities coalesce and work out their differences in years to come, I expect it'll continue to be a thorny issue. But the important thing is that the power-brokers not take over again. Just in the area of the internal-cumbustion engine - which I reckon we'll be seeing a lot fewer of - I've seen dozens of ideas that would improve the basic design and efficiency. As sexy as they may look, today's cars aren't much different than the originals, as far as engine and powertrain are concerned. They don't get any better mileage, either. I had a 1960 Rambler American with a flat-head six and a three-on-the-column many years ago, that got 35 miles to a gallon back when that gallon cost 20¢. And I had a 1964 Volvo sedan that got better than 30. People have been able to build 100-MPG cars for sixty years, but the petroleum industry wanted none of that. Now look at the mess they've made. So many of those old, shelved ideas will be coming into their own!
I know that small, efficient wind turbines are possible. The main problems I've read about with wind power are noise, and carnage to migrating birds. In any NP considerations of mass power and communications, we'll have to take the planet itself into consideration, including all its living creatures. There's so much evidence that EM fields corrode the environment and cause disease, it will be a real challenge to think of ways of delivering power that don't disrupt life at the cellular level. Local production and storage of DC seems to me to be the only logical way to go.
I can envision a community where there's no money...the simple rule would be that if you don't add value to the community, you don't partake of its bounties - BEYOND A VERY BASIC LEVEL. I don't believe in turning anyone away who needs a meal, if there is to spare. One guy, or a group of folks, might decide to use his time and ability to build a way to generate more power than he needs. Say he was able to get his hands on a bunch of surplus solar panels, or figured out a wind turbine like our friend. As a member who adds value to his community, he would never need to worry about a meal or a place to live, or seeing the town doctor or sitting on the various councils. As long as everyone operated under this same paradigm, there would be no need for money. What I imagine, though, is that someone would start to think that HIS contribution was "worth more" than someone else's...and that therefore, HIS house should be the one on the hill. Shouldn't a doctor be paid more than a guy who works at a power plant? Why should he - they are equally necessary. Make the greens fees affordable, and they could even be golf buddies. But if not the doctor, what about the guy who fixes things? Or the one who everyone seems to turn to for wisdom and guidance? Hubris and greed can pop up just about anywhere. I don't think we're going to just walk into a Garden of Eden. I think the Old Paradigms will die hard, and that OP folks will be with us for a long time.
Still hoping to see an update on this Nu-Energy...corny name. It's the same old energy, just a jazzy new power plant. I'd love to see pictures.
8-D
Is this new technology from or are you aware of AERO (Advanced Energy Research Organization)?
http://pesn.com/2007/11/02/9500455_AERO_Award/
http://www.aero2012.com/en/index.html
http://www.aero2012.com/en/risk.mhtml
And what has been the response/reaction of the current energy-producing/monopolizing paradigm/construct?
Chris