1. Forums
  2. Public Forums
  3. General Discussion
  4. Royal Couple Already Related

Royal Couple Already Related

Knightspirit's picture
Posted by Knightspirit on April 30, 2011 - 2:20pm
Tags: 
Stub

I love it - more evidence of bloodlines being controlled and propagated among the "Elites." Gotta keep those Reptilian genes fresh!  

 

Bob07's picture
Posted by Bob07 on April 30, 2011 - 6:39pm

Lovely young couple.  Everything is smiles and roses.  Just as it was with Diana and Charles before them.  But a romance can go sour.  Just as it did with Diana and Charles before them.  And when things go sour amongst royals, they can go deadly sour.  ... And so... I hope that Prince William hasn't inherited his father's loose-fitting trousers, but if he has, my wish is that Kate doesn't feel compelled to object by embarrassing the Crown as her mother-in-law did.  ...In short, I wish her a normal lifespan.

Posted by fairyfarmgirl (not verified) on May 1, 2011 - 4:45am

What a surprise... (gasp)  The royals are inbreeding?  No Way...

fairy

Wendy's picture
Posted by Wendy on May 1, 2011 - 5:40am

If you can trace your family back far enough you find that you're are related to most everyone. These families have just kept better records than most - we're mostly all cousins here on planet earth.

Wendy

Noa's picture
Posted by Noa on May 3, 2011 - 11:08am

Imbreeding was one of the central promises made to Mayer Amschel Rothchild (23 February 1744 – 19 September 1812) by his decendents, before his death, in order to keep the wealth in the family... like they need anymore wealth and power than they already have!

Bob07's picture
Posted by Bob07 on May 3, 2011 - 2:48pm

I agree, Noa, that the elite is more inbred than probably any other group except maybe the Pitcairn Islanders.  But to be fair, a 14/13 generation genetic separation (as with William and Kate, respectively) is not exactly inbreeding.   I understand that consanguinity laws vary from state to state and country to country, but it's proabaly safe to say that we can legally and safely have children with someone related even as close as 3 generations back.

Knightspirit's picture
Posted by Knightspirit on May 3, 2011 - 9:01pm

The point here is that she was APPROVED for marriage because of the relation. If they were not of the same blood - he would not be marrying her. So it isn't really a question of "inbreeding" so much as blood relation. They are doing more than just keeping track of the family tree - they are actively using it to continue the "purity" of the bloodline. 

David Icke says that they require this in order to "shapeshift" from Reptilians to humans. THAT I am not so sure about - but there is no shortage of evidence of the blood relations going on - and they of course cross over to the US presidents as well (not sure how Obama ties into that though). 

I am guessing that if any one of us traced back the lineages of ourselves and our totally random spouses - that very few would tie together so nicely. Maybe they would meet somewhere thousands of years ago - but not this closely. My ex wife was from the Philippines for example - doubt you would see THAT in a royal wedding, LOL! 

Wendy's picture
Posted by Wendy on May 4, 2011 - 3:49am

Well the royals have definitely taken family pride to a whole new level and I agree that they have a "we're better than them" attitude but I get tired of all the claims that the presidents are related, etc. I happen to be of mostly British ancestry and my Dad had a hobby of tracing our family tree. Everytime these stories come out, I think, yea, they're related to me too, whoop-de-doo!

Wendy

LightCommodore's picture
Posted by LightCommodore on May 4, 2011 - 8:58pm

Thanks for sharing that. It's very interesting, no matter what the implications are or aren't.

Chuck

The Gathering Spot is a PEERS empowerment website
"Dedicated to the greatest good of all who share our beautiful world"