I thought this deserved its own topic string: Wendy's second post under Noa's "Consciousness Beyond Chemtrails" is a video interview with former mechanical engineering professor Dr. Judy Wood, in which she lays out extremely compelling evidence that the Twin Towers and Bldg. 7 (and 4 other buildings!) were brought down not by planes or fires or controlled demolition charges, but by by directed electromagnetic resonance technology. And secondarily she shows how we saw what we were told to see, not what was clearly before us. Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=7ChzRz4pmKc
And here's her website, where you can view the photo and video evidence, which is astounding: http://www.drjudywood.com/ . Here are many toasted cars, some not even in the Twin Towers vicinity, vehicles unaccountably overturned (with the foliage of nearby trees intact), one car somehow having been lifted and set down on top of a fence, an enormous steel beam bent like a hairpin with no heat discoloration, reams of unburned scattered paper near burning objects ... and much more.
Most of these images I've never seen and you probably haven't either (I wonder why), but the ones of the "collapsing" buildings we've all seen many times, and yet we apparently "saw" what we were told we were seeing, not what was clearly happening: the buildings not collapsing but disintegrating into fine dust in mid-air. It's as clear as day. And nothing can do this but some kind of resonance, or molecular-dissociation, technology.
To see an example of this kind of technology, here's a very short video of Canadian inventor John Hutchison demonstrating anti-gravity and molecular dissociation (disintegration) caused by his technology: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeUgDJc6AWE . (Be sure to see the second half of the video.
Dr. Wood concludes that the 911 Truth movement has been in part managed by essentially establishing the basic story that the buildings collapsed, which led to the conclusion that they were brought down by controlled demolition, with the use of thermite or thermate. And this has kept out of sight the "biggie": the existence and use of this advanced electromagnetic technology.
...some of her stuff way back when I first started my trip down the rabbit hole. I remember one clip where there was a pillar or beam of some sort that just turned to dust right in front of your eyes. SHe also showed pictures from above that showed a perfect circular cut out on one side of a building. I'll have to check her site again as it has been about 4 years since I saw that stuff.
Yea, she makes a pretty good case but I think the controlled demolition charges were there as well so it was a combination of both that did it.
Thanks everyone for your continued posts about 9/11. After watching the video, "Explosive Evidence" http://www.gatheringspot.net/video/general-discussion/north-tower-exploding-david-chandler, I was convinced that the Towers came down by controlled demolition. Much thermite residue has been discovered on site. Now with Dr. Judy's testimony, I think electromagnetic technology may just as likely have been used -- maybe it was a combination of things.
To my mind, the evidence is so overwhelming that the towers did not collapse from jet fuel fires that it seems only a matter of time before the majority of rational minds come to this realization. The 9/11 scenario could well be the weakest link in the false flag agenda and may bring this sinister house of cards tumbling down as much in free fall as the former Twin Towers did.
I pray for truth; I pray for justice; I pray for lasting peace.
I agree Noa-but maybe all the open minds have been reached already?
I look at the pavement beneath the melted cars said to be 7 blocks from the WTC buildings and there's little debris, they are facing in different directions and even double parked! I suspect these cars were dropped there by tow trucks to make room in the streets and lots near the rubble. I'm less than convinced by the photos. I don't understand what would cause some of the melting effects though.
I am more settled on the idea of explosives since residue has been found, the obvious prep work done just before the attacks, and the molten metal flowing underground for weeks. There are quite a few distraction/disinformation videos and sites out there on Sept. 11. Many about how missiles were used and other unlikely stuff. I think it's to discredit the overall movement and make it appear that 9/11truth seekers are flighty, dumb, scattered or desperate to believe.
I agree that the evidence supports a combination of thermite and EM dissociative technology. It's not one or the other.
But look at the videos of the buildings dissociating into dust in mid-air. The cascade of dust. The steel spire-framework turning to dust and then falling. Have you ever seen anything remotely like it before?
Gosh Brian, is no one really questioning the official 9/11 story anymore? It would be great if some of you would put it to the test. Bring it up in casual conversation and see what the general consensus is. I have a hard time believing that people with backgrounds in physics, engineering, and other such disciplines are swallowing this. I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me how a jet was flown into the Pentagon (among other things).
Surely there must be a few rational minds left in common circles who know that things just aren't right. (Don't stress my mind with conspiracy theories, just molest and irradiate my body so I can feel safe.)
Let me add that recently I met a Canadian tourist who was talking American politics with two German travelers. He was saying how stupid Americans were for not being able to count votes correctly during the first George Bush [s]election. Then he went on to perpetuate the official 9/11 story. When I interjected that the election was rigged and that 9/11 was a false flag operation, he just ignored me and went on with his viewpoint like he was an authority. I decided that convincing him wasn't worth the argument so I let it pass.
Where did all the inquiring minds go?
I don't really know this but I suspect most people have made up their minds by now except they might change them if they read the evidence. I was (very unwisely I now realize) trying to explain the false flag position to my teens after it came up in conversation. I later discovered their mom thought I was unhinged, produced the 9/11 commission report and one son read it. They now all believe that report. So it can go the other way too.
To accept the truth about 9/11 you must first accept the existence of the amount of EVIL required to engineer such a horrendous act. I was in denial for a lengthy period of time before I could get my head around that one.
Once you swallow that frog, however, the other black ops click logically into place.
It horrified me. I was in a terrible state. I tried to to talk to people close to me but they would fall asleep right in front of me! Out like a light! I felt completely alone. If I hadn't found Fred's site and hadn't gotten some perspective from the Transformation course (and a little help from my guide/mentor here) I think I could have had a nervous breakdown.
I decided last year to revisit the current 9/11 websites, videos and films and see where things were. There is more disinformation in the form of videos and wild theories than before. They seemed meant to discredit the subject. Like one saying that every single video of planes hitting the towers was faked, including CCTV, handheld cameras, News footage, independent video crews who were in the area, the film by the French crew of the first plane hitting, police cameras etc. Even witnesses! The site had all these 'background checks' of videographers and techs that seemed to indicate they were always associated with something suspicious or someone implicated. They had many technical 'analyses' of each video showing how the planes were inserted into the frames-the supposed distortions of the images. It all seemd so plausible. I was considering it seriously. But you had to step back and ask " Overall-is this really a likely conspiracy?" "Could they have really pulled all these independant people into a huge conspiracy?" The answer was no. It suddenly seemed plausible that it was a work of deep disnformation and that alone was scary.
I haven't re-visited all those sites for a long time,,,,haha! You are brave ! I was working in a remote desert location on 9/11, and had nothing but a small radio...It was on NPR that morning, so all I got was the radio feed,,,and, when the 2nd plane hit,,,my partner and I turned to each other and said,,,something's up ! We would drive the 2 and a half hours to town once a week to get supplies, so we didn't see any of the footage for several days afterwards. I see that as a plus, as that was a huge part in instilling all that fear in the masses...we talked about it over those days before returning, and had already decided it was an inside job.
I agree, there is probably a ton of dis-info out there now,,,to dilute the basic facts that make it quite obvious that it wasn't committed by 15 guys with box cutters.....The pentagon story alone is enough to prove it. The most heavily guarded building in the world, and not one piece of video showing a plane hitting it. The video cams of local businesses being confiscated within hours of the hit,,,,no plane wreckage on the site, except for an obviously "placed" piece of fuselage, where there should of been two sheared off wings,,,,,,and the obviously impossible angle, and penetration of the plane,,,no real fires, untouched furniture within 2 feet of the sliced impact area,,,,,,none of it supports a plane hitting the building....The bunker buster was the only "known" thing that could of penetrated all those layers of reinforced concrete...I built walls like this at Hamilton standard ,a long time ago, and I also doubt any plane could have penetrated so many of these,,,especially when the opening was so much smaller then the plane....
So, it is plain to see that all the dis-info could take away from the basic facts,,,,,nothing they said happened was physically possible.....So I just try to keep that in mind....Fot a while, when people brought it up,,I would think,,,,god, there is so many more things to question, get over it,,,,but,,because of the worldwide witnessing of this event, I now believe that it could eventually be the catalyst for a big step in the change that has to come, unleashing people's minds to "see" and question all the rest of the tactics that have been used to further the agendas of those in power....Let's hope so,,,,,,T
I can't vouch for the authenticity of this theory, but it makes sense to me. One supposition is that the false flag events used hologram images of airplanes along with broadcasted audio to simulate actual plane crashes. This would account for the video coverage and the eye witness testimony, while allowing for the absence of physical plane parts in the reckage.
I think holograms and energy weapons are really possible but I also think planes (into the WTC) fits the Occams razor thing. It certainly could be a combination of things too. No matter how many times I watch the best views of the collapses, I am fascinated by the strangeness of it. How as the 2nd tower collapses it looks like a banana peeling away...but then you see the topmost material being ejected is shooting up before it falls down! No way! I've tried hard to imagine how it's an optical illusion (it may still be) but I can't seem to grasp how. The buildings just turn to dust-in mid air! How?
The thing about the Pentagon I can't figure is the knocked down light posts. A cruise missile would have missed them and tscout -you're right about the glaring lack of evidence but I wonder if the perps just understood that the con was so big that people would ignore the problems. Have you ever heard the rule about cons that says the biggest cons are the easiest to pull off because everyone knows a con can't be that big or fool that many people?
Here's a G-Spot post on the mind control aspect called 'Hypnotic Trance Inducement via the Twin Towers' here's the post: http://www.gatheringspot.net/topic/general-discussion/hypnotic-trance-inducement-twin-towers Watch the video link by Dr. Larry Burke.
Here's a nice web page of his points: http://nc911truth.blogspot.com/2006/07/mass-hypnosis-on-911-waking-up-from.html
I've since met Larry Burke many times and we've become friends. He's an amazing person. Bob-when I think about Judy Woods research-it's pretty damned compelling. How did all that burning take place? I wonder if there were people vaporized in the path of a weapon.