What do you think ??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TTd5fKYcR3M
What do you think ??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=TTd5fKYcR3M
The Gathering Spot is a PEERS empowerment website
"Dedicated to the greatest good of all who share our beautiful world"
I'm much more worried about an ice age. Co2 is such a small part of the total atmosphere that even when it goes up 300%, it's still miniscule compared to the total content of the atmosphere. I think the total population of the earth's ants and termites still contributes more co2 than humans do. The earth seemed to be just fine during the middle ages warm period when Greenland got it's namebecause it really was green.
That said there's never a reason to use the earth's resources unwisely or pollute more than we have to. But there are way more serious things being done to the planet than the burning of fossile fuels - Fukushima, depleted uranium weapons, gmo contamination, pesticide contamination, pollution of the oceans.
Ooooops! I didn't see your link. Sorry about that Eric, yes I agree with the film.
You are right in your words though, thank you for sharing .
Love all < Eric
Apart from a small minority of pristine "it's a conspiracy" believers, I find people with progressive values usually believe scientists warnings of global warming and people with conservative values generally don't. Since conservatives make up probably 100% of evolution deniers I have tried to understand their POV or reason for denying global warming as religious but it's hard to see how it relates to a '5000 year old earth'. So I've assumed it relates to conservatives wanting unlimited resource plunder (Bible gives license to this too). A Prius for instance, stands as an afront to my conservative friends who prefer thirsty v8's. They say "It's a piece of shit" or make some disparaging remark about 'holier than thou liberals'-but admit no rational explanation for their visceral hatred of it. Any attempt by a believer at discussion of evidence of global warming leads to an emotional scene where deniers false evidence is presented in a "Take THAT!!" ambush followed by false evidence of deceit from scientists ("See? It's a draw! They're a pack of liars.) so it's not about rational thought or scientific evidence-clearly. The intensity of emotion is the giveaway. No?
It's incredibly sad that people I care deeply about-many who I went to school with and who understand the basic concept of scientific process, still deny science because of their bible and their abject terror of having it shown to be a false guide to how the universe functions. There is no second chance to stop global warming so I expect we will have to live our later days in squalor and die of thirst, hunger or exposure because the planet is heading for environmental devastation and collapse and right now, when we had this chance to stop it, we said "No! The bible trumps reality" or "Fuck you-I want my fast car".
There won't be a moment of "I told you so!" for those who tried to save us. You'll be hearing deniers declare global warming is God 'punishing us for our sins' with their last breath. No?
Brian ,
I cannot agree with you on this and I am none of the above. I am not republican, democrat ,independent , conservative ,left,right ,and surely not christian. Talk about conspiracy, anything Al Gore is involved in you know is corrupt lies, look who is pushing the agenda , to know the truth that is all we have to do. The banksters and Prince Phillip should have been enough to shed light on this, look at all the super corrupt pushing the green agenda and another thing read the ingredients on the some of the so called green products . I do not necessarily agree with everything in the video . Have you ever done background on Darwin ? or researched rh negative genes and dna coding. I think you should check my other post you might like it , I am asking because of your comment on evolution, just curious. Anyway I would love to hear your feedback . I am always open minded to other theories and opinions , hey thanks for sharing with me .
I love you all , Eric
Thanks for asking. I am voicing my exasperation with people who hold to two "scientific" opinions. No evolution and no global warming. If someone tells me that the bible proves that evolution is false, they have lost the ability to participate in an argument or discussion. This is exactly what I run into over and over. It's like speaking to a 4 year old. Would you ask a 4 year old to design a suspension bridge or a dam?
My ex sister in law is an oceanographer and weather scientist at NOAA. She's one of those people in the thick of it so when I said to conservative/denier friends that she says global warming is real they respond with various explanations over time (it changes constantly): She's not very smart/she isn't able to see all of the oceans because we've barely explored 5% of them/ it's just a theory/ my favorite was today-now it's HAARP fooling all the scientists into believing the weather/climate is changing by natural means...reminds me of Christians in the 80's saying that dinosaur bones are buried by GOD to test us. Or that when a scientist does an experiment that GOD (or was it Satan?) changes the results in the test tube to fool them. Is that credible? Do you base life or death decisions on that kind of thinking?
Voters in my current home state of NC elected officials who want to roll back the clock and remove mention of evolution from textbooks, they passed a law to disallow actual sea level measurements to guide development of the beachs (so anticipated rapid ocean rise doesn't slow developers). So deniers are being used to assist in dumbing down my children and ruining the beaches
There is something happening I just don't believe what they are saying it is . Like I said, look who is saying it and I am positive there have already cornered the green market . New laws are coming to keep things green too. We will see what is to come here in the near future . The Biosphere has changed over and over again through the years . Look at old maps Antarctic used to be warm research some of Graham Hancock stuff on old maps it is incredible . There is lot out there !!!!
Love all< eric
There are two things about global warming that stand out for me more than any others (and there are many others worth consdidering):
1. If global warming exists, the debate amongst global warming believers is never, Are humans causing it or the bulk of it? The very avoidance of that question in the public debate makes me wonder. It seems to be taken as an unquestioned assumption. There is proportedly science that supports this view and science that does not. Even so, the question is rarely if ever debated. Why is that? And so how are we to know the truth?
2. Are the sea levels rising? Again, there is supposedly data that indicates that sea levels are rising and data that indicates that it is not. How are we to know which set of data is fraudulent or just incorrect? Well, I asked friends of mine who live on a low-lying island in the Caribbean what they thought. They've lived there for well over 30 years. They said that their property was right on a canal. They said that the water came practically up to their lawn, and that the water level hadn't changed a bit in all that time (except of course for tides and storms). I also asked another person, a stranger, who had lived there all his life, and he said the same. Of course, during storms and tsunami's wherever they occur, the sea level rises markedly for a short time, but this is about levels during normal conditions. So... I trust the people I talked to. I know they weren't lying and they're not fools.
My provisional conclusion: There is much that isn't being addressed in the public debate, and being certain that we know without direct experience or a sure knowledge of the accuracy of the data used to support whichever side of the argument, is fooling ourselves. I don't like the LaRouche people that much, but the young man in the video did bring up some questions that have merit in their own right and deserve to be looked into. But I do agree completely with the last thing he said: "Just because you share an opinion, how do you know it's really yours?" In fact, that's a vitally important question for all of us in all situations. We think we know -- in fact we desperately want to feel that we know -- but what arrogance. If science has taught us one thing it's that what we declare as knowledge -- or fact -- is provisional by its very nature. But we still haven't accepted that we're living in an essentially unknown world every single day. And that could be scary -- but it could also be tremendously liberating.
My opinion is that it's wise to question everything -- especially our own "certainties."
One thing to look at here is history does repeat itself . Let us take a trip back in time, momentarily to John D. Rockefeller. He preplanned and cornered markets with no competition what was holding him back nothing . Here is what I see happening they are lobbying right now for the green products and new laws will come into affect and nobody will be able to say no . Kind of like what Monsanto and Obama made them untouchable, same concept once these laws are here your hands are pretty much tied . One thing I can see is, something is not right and when you get that gut feeling follow it 99.9% of the time, your intuition is right on the money . Also the carbon tax they have been pushing 10 or so years now . They are charging for air and water which means they are commodities, what a market for consumables huh , so as you can see I can go on and on about this . There is an agenda and it is not good , so we as partners with this biosphere need to stop all of this madness . I am not talking about global warming, I am talking about a worldwide system change . Our current system is very broken wealthy people living in 66,000 sq. ft. homes when people are starving to death . The way we live here in America has consequences too everytime somebody in a g20 country flushes there toilet someone in a third world country dies of thirst let us put this into our thoughts and get busy changing things to the best of our ability . This system is severely broken on a global scale , 2014 is going to be a good year for bringing this to light and start to help each other and become one again . I have a good feeling about that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I welcome anymore input on this I think this will make people aware and get busy do anything they can to do the right thing .
Love all<Eric
I think it's interesting that evolution came up here because I think it's been pushed by the mainstream media and the religions to become a hot button issue. Theres a programming agenda being pushed here that brings about categorizing people into groups and not appreciating the subtleties in opinions or facts. IE: "If you don't trust science, then you must be one of those religious fanatics."
Well I don't believe in evolution either, nor the Bible - I like Sitchin's idea that aiens were "The Gods" of the bible that messed with our DNA.
I took a history of science class in college. I personally think there should be more history of science taught in school. It's amazing how inaccurate science has been over the years - how it has been influenced by other political and religious forces, etc. Religion has been much more inacurate so lets not confine ourselves to either system of thought but use what data we have at hand to form our own opinions.
The world is an amazing place and I think there is so much we don't know. I think it is right to criticise both religion and science when it doesn't make sense or it is inconsistent. That is what the scientific method is supposed to be all about. We just have to realize that just because someone with a scientific degree is talking, doesn't mean they are using that method to reach their conclusions. The mind is very easily manipulated - the bad "science" behind the medical establishment these days is a good example of how smart people can be manipulated into beieving things based on being told by their teachers, rather than first hand observation. When "scientists" trust what their teachers tell them without question, they are now participating in religion, not science.
The Earth is always changing! If it weren't , I would really be scared! Yes,,,I believe that the deforestation has done just as much damage, if not more, than burning fossil fuels, because it compounds the effect. But I don't believe it is the true cause. Like many, I don't want to say that publicly,,,because fossil fuels are a problem for other reasons. It makes me sick to think of all the earth we have hollowed out,,,all the trillions of tons of ores we have removed from the guts of this planet and put on topofit,,,ot turned into gas in the atmosphere. And the thought that just about everything we use is from dead dinosaurs,ha!
But, an interesting point that has been made in lectures,but never on mainstream,,,is that all the planets we have been able to monitor have shown increases in temperature,,,,not from martian cars and co2,,,but from the speed and counterspeed of the forces inside the planets. It is science that we don't really study in school, so when itis mentioned,,,it goes right by us. Theories are that the part of the universe we are in now is denser, or less dense,,,I don't remember which,,,,but ,it is measurable, and would effect anything moving through it,just as a spinning ball would speed or slow depending on what itis spinning in. The photon levels are much higher,and that would change many things,,,including activating more dna in everything exposed to it. Ifit is true that we will be passing through this different environment for 2 to 3 thousand years, then we should expect changes,,,long term, of all types! I can only hope to be around to see some of them. Like you said Brian, who knows which info is correct? But either way,it makes for a most interesting (and difficult sometimes) time to be alive! L,,,T
Once again,,,the bigger picture is simpler! The Earth isa living organism, and is changing all the time.We live on the Earth. But our system has remained the same,at least since this country began. So, as the Earth changes,,,we must change too. We all know that those who have profited from this "system" will do anything to keep it intact, as they will lose their power if they give in to the changes that they know are necessary. Hence the conflict. Pretty much everything we post here is fallout from the situation. I am not by any means saying our conversations aren't important,,,,just reminding myself to back up and look at it from a different perspective when I feel frustrated, helpless,confused,any of the above,,,or below,,,etc..
I have just watched this fabulous talk by Rosa Koire on the enormous conspiracy (UN Adenda 21) to use global warming and care of the environment as the club to crush us into a global totalitarian state and I completely believe her! My head is spinning. Finally things fit into place from this.
Opening avenues for you awesome . Open mindedness is key . Knowledge is key as well . More power to you my brother . We'll call it the GREEEN MACHIINE .
Love all <> Eric
I'm disheartened that Eric's question about this issue has turned into a binary political and religious argument. Aren't we, as graduates of the PEERS courses smarter than that?
And Brian, I'm delighted that you've discovered at least one Agenda 21 video, but it's hard for me to conceive that you have been on this forum for over 4 years without being exposed to this information before. Sometimes I wonder how many of our posts are actually being read by members.
I recently came across a video that explained how the "scientific" theory of global warming has come into being. I'll look for the video and post it as it's own topic. In a nutshell the process is this: the PTSB draft the outcomes they want the world to believe, then they hire undergraduate science majors (not experienced scientists) to support their conclusions. The scientists who don't play the game aren't funded or are otherwise silenced.
Yes, global warming/climate change is a hoax, (CO2 is not the enemy... it's what plants breathe) and this is all designed to serve agendas like 21 and the NWO.
I believe these people use anything and everything at their disposal to profit, and to further their agendas. It appears that the "green machine" is just a tactic to keep control of the new energies as they come to light, you know,,so they can keep us paying for it. If people think that the "government" is doing something about it,,,the alleged problem", they are less likely to pursue the real answer, free energy, which would take away their power. When I was in Taos,,the county and the electric co-op wanted us to pay to build a wind farm out in the desert, but , upon it's completion, the townspeople would still be paying for the electricity that came from it. Luckily,the people there were smart enough to shoot it down.That's just an example of how dumb they think people are...
If it is true that our bodies are changing, along with everything else on the planet, and our solar system as a whole, and "they" know this,,then, them becoming more blatant about pushing their agenda makes perfect sense to me. The more angry they can make us,,the more likely they will succeed, as our anger blocks any chance we have of utilizing the changes that are taking place to OUR advantage, instead of theirs....other than an all out mass rebellion,ha!!!!!!!!!! What fun!!!!
As we peel back the layers of the onion, lets keep in mind that we are all unaware of the core truth. Each of us is on a journey and no one has arrived. Although we have some first hand evidence, like Bob clearly pointed out, everything else we "know" about global warming is hear say. Tricksters and liars are about and these experts in mind control could be purposely making their case look bad so that we don't believe them! So Brians ex sister in law might be right! Always keep questioning!
Please let me apologize for my comment directed at Brian. It was harsh. As Wendy said, each of us is on a journey. Arriving at the the "truth" isn't a contest.
Actually, it seems to me like more people are waking up to the bigger picture these days. I don't have any proof of this other than witnessing more alternative news making its way to the masses. Even the conspirators themselves are admitting some of their conspiracies. Take for example, the annual Bilderberg meetings. Just a few years ago, these covert assemblies were denied to exist, but as more people have become aware of them, they are being acknowledged (though the importance of these meetings is still minimized and their contents remains secretive). The same can be said of false flag events like Sandy Hook. It's getting more and more difficult for the conspirators to get away with these things as we smarten up.
Slowly, we're chipping away at the foundation of lies. Uncovering one lie leads us to question more of everything. I sense a mushrooming effect happening. In the next few years I think we're going to see a sudden explosion of mass awakening.
Thank you for the clarification. I DO dismiss some topics here because there is a continuum of "conspiracy theories" (for lack of a better expression) from hard facts to the impossible floating around on the Internet! I am surprised by what people will believe. My evolving belief is that GWarming is real, but is being used to crush us psychologically. I believe the trillions of barrels of oil and millions of trainloads of coal already burned over many decades has polluted the atmosphere enough to effect climate. But....Agenda21 harnesses this problem to forward their goals of removing our freedom. That must be dealt with.
Rosa got past my resistance to "conspiracy theories" by her straightforward presentation and the fact that the documents are there! BTW-High Density condo's were built intrusively in the middle of my small town, went bankrupt, and had been forcefed down the throats of the town as 'sustainable development' by an organised effort, EXACTLY AS SHE SAID WE COULD EXPECT TO FIND !!!!!! I was astonished.
I caution everyone who bristles at information that seems hard to swallow at first. Resist the urge to dismiss these things with the catch-all term, "conspiracy theories." Calling people "conspiracy theorists" is a knee-jerk reaction that serves to close people's minds before the evidence can be examined objectively.
The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination. “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”
Many conspiracy theories have later been proven to be conspiracy facts.
People who use these terms often don't understand the actual meaning of the words.
con·spir·a·cy
[kuhn-spir-uh-see]
the·o·ry
[thee-uh-ree, theer-ee]
noun, plural the·o·ries.
The Dreyfus Affair: In the late 1800s in France, Jewish artillery officer Alfred Dreyfus was wrongfully convicted of treason based on false government documents, and sentenced to life in prison. The French government did attempt to cover this up, but Dreyfus was eventually pardoned after the affair was made public (an act that is credited to writer Émile Zola).
2.
The Mafia: This secret crime society was virtually unknown until the 1960s, when member Joe Valachi first revealed the society’s secrets to law enforcement officials. What was known was that organized crime existed, but not that the extent of their control included working with the CIA, politicians and the biggest businesses in the world.
3.
MK-ULTRA: In the 1950s to the 1970s, the CIA ran a mind-control project aimed at finding a “truth serum” to use on communist spies. Test subjects were given LSD and other drugs, often without consent, and some were tortured. At least one man, civilian biochemist Frank Olson, who was working for the government, died as a result of the experiments. The project was finally exposed after investigations by the Rockefeller Commission.
4.
Operation Mockingbird: Also in the 1950s to ’70s, the CIA paid a number of well-known domestic and foreign journalists (from big-name media outlets like Time, The Washington Post, The New York Times, CBS and others) to publish CIA propaganda. The CIA also reportedly funded at least one movie, the animated “Animal Farm,” by George Orwell. The Church Committee finally exposed the activities in 1975.
5.
Manhattan Project: The Manhattan Project was the codename for a project conducted during World War II to develop the first atomic bomb. The project was led by the United States, and included participation from the United Kingdom and Canada. Formally designated as the Manhattan Engineer District (MED), it refers specifically to the period of the project from 1942–1946 under the control of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, under the administration of General Leslie R. Groves. The scientific research was directed by American physicist J. Robert Oppenheimer. The project’s roots lay in scientists’ fears since the 1930s that Nazi Germany was also investigating nuclear weapons of its own. Born out of a small research program in 1939, the Manhattan Project eventually employed more than 130,000 people and cost nearly US$2 billion ($22 billion in current value). It resulted in the creation of multiple production and research sites that operated in secret. With the total involved, this makes it one of the largest conspiracies in history. Entire towns were built for short periods of time, employing people, all under secrecy and top national secrecy at that. The government never admitted to it, the media never reported on it, and people had no idea for over 25 years. Project research took place at over thirty sites across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The three primary research and production sites of the project were the plutonium-production facility at what is now the Hanford Site, the uranium-enrichment facilities at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the weapons research and design laboratory now known as Los Alamos National Laboratory. The MED maintained control over U.S. weapons production until the formation of the Atomic Energy Commission in January 1947.
6.
Asbestos: Between 1930 and 1960, manufacturers did all they could to prevent the link between asbestos and respiratory diseases, including cancer, becoming known, so they could avoid prosecution. American workers had in fact sued the Johns Manville company as far back as 1932, but it was not until 1962 that epidemiologists finally established beyond any doubt what company bosses had known for a long time – asbestos causes cancer.
7.
Watergate: Republican officials spied on the Democratic National Headquarters from the Watergate Hotel in 1972. While conspiracy theories suggested underhanded dealings were taking place, it wasn’t until 1974 that White House tape recordings linked President Nixon to the break-in and forced him to resign.
8.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study: The United States Public Health Service carried out this clinical study on 400 poor, African-American men with syphilis from 1932 to 1972. During the study the men were given false and sometimes dangerous treatments, and adequate treatment was intentionally withheld so the agency could learn more about the disease. While the study was initially supposed to last just six months, it continued for 40 years. Close to 200 of the men died from syphilis or related complications by the end of the study.
9.
Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.
Author James Bamford, “A Pretext For War”, discusses the declassified “Operation Northwoods” documents revealing that in 1962 the CIA was planning to stage phony terrorist attacks on the US and blame it on Cuba to start a war:
10.
1990 Testimony of Nayirah: A 15-year-old girl named “Nayirah” testified before the U.S. Congress that she had seen Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti babies from incubators, causing them to die. The testimony helped gain major public support for the 1991 Gulf War, but — despite protests that the dispute of this story was itself a conspiracy theory — it was later discovered that the testimony was false. The public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which was in the employ of Citizens for a Free Kuwait, had arranged the testimony. It turned out that she had taken acting lessons on request of the CIA and was actually the niece of a major politician in Kuwait. Nayirah was later disclosed to be Nayirah al-Sabah, daughter of Saud bin Nasir Al-Sabah, Kuwaiti ambassador to the USA. The Congressional Human Rights Caucus, of which Congressman Tom Lantos was co-chairman, had been responsible for hosting Nurse Nayirah, and thereby popularizing her allegations. When the girl’s account was later challenged by independent human rights monitors, Lantos replied, “The notion that any of the witnesses brought to the caucus through the Kuwaiti Embassy would not be credible did not cross my mind… I have no basis for assuming that her story is not true, but the point goes beyond that. If one hypothesizes that the woman’s story is fictitious from A to Z, that in no way diminishes the avalanche of human rights violations.” Nevertheless, the senior Republican on the Human Rights Caucus, John Edward Porter, responded to the revelations “by saying that if he had known the girl was the ambassador’s daughter, he would not have allowed her to testify.”
11.
Counter Intelligence Programs Against Activists in the 60s: COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971. The FBI’s stated motivation at the time was “protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order.” According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive, such as communist and socialist organizations; the women’s rights movement; militant black nationalist groups, and the non-violent civil rights movement, including individuals such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, the American Indian Movement, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labeled “New Left”, including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those “seeking independence for Puerto Rico.” The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert “white hate groups,” including the Ku Klux Klan and National States’ Rights Party. The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the activities of these movements and their leaders.
12.
The Iran-Contra Affair: In 1985 and ’86, the White House authorized government officials to secretly trade weapons with the Israeli government in exchange for the release of U.S. hostages in Iran. The plot was uncovered by Congress in 1987.
13.
The BCCI Scandal: The Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) was a major international bank founded in 1972 by Agha Hasan Abedi, a Pakistani financier. The Bank was registered in Luxembourg. Within a decade BCCI touched its peak, it operated in 78 countries, had over 400 branches, and had assets in excess of US$ 20 billion making it the 7th largest private bank in the world by assets. In the late 1980′s BCCI became the target of a two year undercover operation conducted by the US Customs Service. This operation concluded with a fake wedding that was attended by BCCI officers and drug dealers from around the world who had established a personal friendship and working relationship with undercover Special Agent Robert Mazur. After a six month trial in Tampa, key bank officers were convicted and received lengthy prison sentences. Bank officers began cooperating with law enforcement authorities and that cooperation caused BCCI’s many crimes to be revealed. BCCI came under the scrutiny of regulatory bodies and intelligence agencies in the 1980s due to its perceived avoidance of falling under one regulatory banking authority, a fact that was later, after extensive investigations, proven to be false. BCCI became the focus of a massive regulatory battle in 1991 and was described as a “$20-billion-plus heist”. Investigators in the U.S. and the UK revealed that BCCI had been “set up deliberately to avoid centralized regulatory review, and operated extensively in bank secrecy jurisdictions. Its affairs were extraordinarily complex. Its officers were sophisticated international bankers whose apparent objective was to keep their affairs secret, to commit fraud on a massive scale, and to avoid detection.”
14.
CIA Drug Running in LA: Pulitzer Prize Award winning journalist Gary Webb exposed this alongside LAPD Narcotics Officer turned whislteblower and author Michael Ruppert, CIA Contract Pilot Terry Reed, and many others. In August 1996 the San Jose Mercury News published Webb’s “Dark Alliance”, a 20,000 word, three-part investigative series which alleged that Nicaraguan drug traffickers had sold and distributed crack cocaine in Los Angeles during the 1980s, and that drug profits were used to fund the CIA-supported Nicaraguan Contras. Webb never asserted that the CIA directly aided drug dealers to raise money for the Contras, but he did document that the CIA was aware of the cocaine transactions and the large shipments of cocaine into the U.S. by the Contra personnel. “Dark Alliance” received national attention. At the height of the interest, the web version of it on San Jose Mercury News website received 1.3 million hits a day. According to the Columbia Journalism Review, the series became “the most talked-about piece of journalism in 1996 and arguably the most famous—some would say infamous—set of articles of the decade.”
15.
Gulf of Tonkin Never Happened: The Gulf of Tonkin Incident is the name given to two separate incidents involving the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the United States in the waters of the Gulf of Tonkin. On August 2, 1964 two American destroyers engaged three North Vietnamese torpedo boats, resulting in the sinking of one of the torpedo boats. This was also the single most important reason for the escalation of the Vietnam War. After Kennedy was assassinated, the Gulf of Tonkin gave the country the sweeping support for aggressive military action against the North Vietnamese. The outcome of the incident was the passage by Congress of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which granted President Lyndon B. Johnson the authority to assist any Southeast Asian country whose government was considered to be jeopardized by “communist aggression”. In 2005, an internal National Security Agency historical study was declassified; it concluded that USS Maddox had engaged the North Vietnamese on August 2, but that there may not have been any North Vietnamese vessels present during the engagement of August 4. The report stated “It is not simply that there is a different story as to what happened; it is that no attack happened that night…” In truth, Hanoi’s navy was engaged in nothing that night but the salvage of two of the boats damaged on August 2. In 1965, President Johnson commented privately: “For all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.” In 1981, Captain Herrick and journalist Robert Scheer re-examined Herrick’s ship’s log and determined that the first torpedo report from August 4, which Herrick had maintained had occurred—the “apparent ambush”—was in fact unfounded. In 1995, retired Vietnamese Defense Minister Vo Nguyen Giap, meeting with former Secretary of Defense McNamara, categorically denied that Vietnamese gunboats had attacked American destroyers on August 4, while admitting to the attack on August 2. In the Fall of 1999, retired senior CIA engineering executive S. Eugene Poteat wrote that he was asked in early August 1964 to determine if the radar operator’s report showed a real torpedo boat attack or an imagined one. In October, 2005 the New York Times reported that Robert J. Hanyok, a historian for the U.S. National Security Agency, had concluded that the NSA deliberately distorted the intelligence reports that it had passed on to policy-makers regarding the August 4, 1964 incident. He concluded that the motive was not political but was probably to cover up honest intelligence errors.
16.
The Business Plot: In 1933, group of wealthy businessmen that allegedly included the heads of Chase Bank, GM, Goodyear, Standard Oil, the DuPont family and Senator Prescott Bush tried to recruit Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler to lead a military coup against President FDR and install a fascist dictatorship in the United States. And yes, we’re talking about the same Prescott Bush who fathered one US President and grandfathered another one. Smedley Butler was both a patriot and a vocal FDR supporter. Apparently none of these criminal masterminds noticed that their prospective point man had actively stumped for FDR in 1932. Smedley spilled the beans to a congressional committee in 1934. Everyone he accused of being a conspirator vehemently denied it, and none of them were brought up on criminal charges. Still, the House McCormack-Dickstein Committee did at least acknowledge the existence of the conspiracy, which ended up never getting past the initial planning stages. Though many of the people who had allegedly backed the Business Plot also maintained financial ties with Nazi Germany up through America’s entry into World War II. In 1934, the Business Plot was publicly revealed by retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler testifying to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee. In his testimony, Butler claimed that a group of men had approached him as part of a plot to overthrow Roosevelt in a military coup. One of the alleged plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their final report, the Congressional committee supported Butler’s allegations of the existence of the plot, but no prosecutions or further investigations followed, and the matter was mostly forgotten.
On July 17, 1932, thousands of World War I veterans converged on Washington, D.C., set up tent camps, and demanded immediate payment of bonuses due them according to the Adjusted Service Certificate Law of 1924. This “Bonus Army” was led by Walter W. Waters, a former Army sergeant. The Army was encouraged by an appearance from retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler, who had considerable influence over the veterans, being one of the most popular military figures of the time. A few days after Butler’s arrival, President Herbert Hoover ordered the marchers removed, and their camps were destroyed by US Army cavalry troops under the command of General Douglas MacArthur. Butler, although a self-described Republican, responded by supporting Roosevelt in that year’s election. In a 1995 History Today article Clayton Cramer argued that the devastation of the Great Depression had caused many Americans to question the foundations of liberal democracy. “Many traditionalists, here and in Europe, toyed with the ideas of Fascism and National Socialism; many liberals dallied with Socialism and Communism.” Cramer argues that this explains why some American business leaders viewed fascism as a viable system to both preserve their interests and end the economic woes of the Depression.
17.
July 20, 1944 Conspiracy to Assassinate Hitler: Among another 20 some odd attempts, this one was one of the largest conspiracies involving hundreds of loyalists in the highest echelons of Hitler’s inner circle. Near the end of WWII, things were rapidly going south for Germany and the time seemed ripe for guilt-ridden Nazi officers to assassinate Hitler and overthrow his government. Colonel Henning von Tresckow recruited Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg to join the conspiracy in 1944. The plot to take out Hitler and then all of his loyal officers was called Operation Valkyrie. The plan was to use the Continuity of Government Proceedings during an assassination on Hitler’s life to take over full control of the government in Germany. The assassination would be blamed on the Nazi SS and therefore allow Stauffenberg to take full control of all aspects of the government. It almost worked. In July 1944, Stauffenberg was promoted so that he could now start attending military strategy meetings with Hitler himself. On more than one occasion Stauffenberg planned to kill Hitler at such a meeting with a briefcase bomb, but he always held off because he also wanted to take out Hitler’s two right-hand men, Hermann Goering and Heinrich Himmler. On July 20, he went for it anyway and exploded a bomb inside Hitler’s conference room with a remote detonator. Hitler survived only minor injuries.
18.
Operation Ajax: For years, Britain had a spiffy trade deal with Iran regarding their prodigious oil fields. The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company was basically a giant money machine for the Anglo half, while the Iranian half got shafted. That all changed in 1951 when Iran nationalized the AIOC and the Iranian parliament elected Mohammed Mossadegh as Prime Minister. Mossadegh was relatively secular, something that pissed of Iranian clerics, but he was also very nationalistic. He was a democratically elected, pro American figure but the West saw his nationalizing of the oil fields a communist move(something Mossadegh thought was the right of the people to profit and pay for services in the country with). Those oil fields were under the control of British Petroleum, but unfortunately Mossadegh overruled this long standing business control. The United States sent Kermit Roosevelt, FDR’s nephew and CIA coordinator in to figure out the mess. The best he could come up with was to confront Mossadegh and have him overthrown and this was accomplished by bringing in what the agency refers to as “jackals.” The United States backed the return of the Shah of Iran, one of the most brutal dictators the country had ever seen and intentionally overthrew years before with the democratic leader, Mossadegh. Until 1979, that is, when a pissed off Iranian populace finally revolted and replaced the monarchy with an anti-West Islamic Republic. The result was a violently anti-American revolution lead by the Ayatollah Khomeini which overthrew the Shah and took hostage US Embassy workers, many of whom were involved in the plot with Kermit Roosevelt that installed the Shah. The planning for the Coup took place largely in that embassy, but Americans were told this was due to the rise of radical Islam and rise of democracy hating Muslims, which of course was far from the truth.
19.
Operation Snow White: Some time during the 1970s, the Church of Scientology decided that they’d had enough. Apparently, the Church of Scientology managed to perform the largest infiltration of the United States government in history. Ever. 5,000 of Scientology’s crack commandos wiretapped and burglarized various agencies. They stole hundreds of documents, mainly from the IRS. No critic was spared, and in the end, 136 organizations, agencies and foreign embassies were infiltrated.
20.
Operation Gladio: Gladio is a code name denoting the clandestine NATO “stay-behind” operation in Italy after World War II, intended to continue anti-communist resistance in the event of a Warsaw Pact invasion of Western Europe. Although Gladio specifically refers to the Italian branch of the NATO stay-behind organizations, “Operation Gladio” is used as an informal name for all stay-behind organizations, sometimes called “Super NATO”. The role of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in sponsoring Gladio and the extent of its activities during the Cold War era, and its relationship to right-wing terrorist attacks perpetrated in Italy during the Years of Lead and other similar clandestine operations is the subject of ongoing debate and investigation. Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have had parliamentary inquiries into the matter. What can we prove about that role? Thousands of documents, depositions and testimony as well as recorded conversations and admission by the highest levels of government in Italy. That’s about as credible as it gets, regardless of the CIA’s adamant denial it ever happened. What took place? The shooting of innocent civilians, terrorism and assassinations all blamed on leftist communists were actually apart of well coordinated, “black operations.” Black operations are typically involving activities that are highly clandestine and, often, outside of standard military protocol.
Black operations may include such things as assassination, sabotage, extortion, spying on allied countries or one’s own citizens, kidnapping, supporting resistance movements, torture, use of fraud to obtain funds, use of child soldiers, human experimentation, trafficking in contraband items, etc. Since 9/11, many black operations and long time unethical standings have been approved for legality in the war on terror. In other words, since September 11th, 2001, it is no a longer conspiracy for any of this to occur, a simple decision by a top level military or CIA official is enough, without oversight or even one thread of admission by the Government or Private conspirators. Much of the Black operations today are performed by private contract companies like Blackwater (now Xe).
This is a documentary banned in teh United States that was allowed to air on BBC. It was an investigation into Operation Gladio:
21.
The CIA Assassinates A Lot Of People (Church Committee): The Church Committee is the common term referring to the United States Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church in 1975. A precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the CIA and FBI after certain activities had been revealed by the Watergate affair. The Committee uncovered, among many other things, that the CIA had violated its charter to perform only gathering of intelligence. For example, the assassinations of Allende in Chile and Mossadegh in Iran. Assassinations against Central and South American leaders and revolutionaries, as well as Africa, Middle East and East Asia. The list was tremendous. They even declassified a “Heart Attack Gun” the Agency had made for the use of killing someone without it being detected. Cancer, car accidents, skiing accidents, suicide, boating accidents, heart attacks, and just plain being shot were common assassination methods. The hearings, although recorded in full in congressional record, the mainstream media and official policies, is still largely not taught in American schools on recent history. The American public still has no idea this was ever actually confirmed or even took place. It is common for people to still refer to any of these assassinations as a joke or made up conspiracy.
22.
The New World Order: This popular conspiracy theory claims that a small group of international elites controls and manipulates governments, industry and media organisations worldwide. The primary tool they use to dominate nations is the system of central banking. They are said to have funded and in some cases caused most of the major wars of the last 200 years, primarily through carrying out false flag attacks to manipulate populations into supporting them, and have a grip on the world economy, deliberately causing inflation and depressions at will. The people behind the New World Order are thought to be international bankers, in particular the owners of the private banks in the Federal Reserve System, Bank of England and other central banks, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group. Now, although this conspiracy theory was ridiculed for years, it turns out that the Bilderberg does meet and requests no media coverage. They receive no media coverage. The world’s elite meet every year and it goes largely unreported, for what?
After the turn of the century, specifically during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama, used the term “new world order” in their advocacy for a Keynesian reform of the global financial system and their calls for a “New Bretton Woods”, which takes into account emerging markets such as China and India. These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, and culminated in former Clinton administration adviser Dick Morris and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity arguing on one of his Fox News Channel programs that “conspiracy theorists were right”. In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically-acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists, such as American radio host Alex Jones, who are committed to exposing and vigorously opposing what they perceive to be an emerging New World Order.
23. Kennedy Assassination – the 2nd Investigation by Congress Few People Know About, United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA): The HSCA was established in 1976 to investigate the John F. Kennedy assassination and the Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination. The Committee investigated until 1978, and in 1979 issued its final report, concluding that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated by a conspiracy involving the mob, and potentially the CIA. The House Select Committee on Assassinations undertook reinvestigations of the murders of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1979, a single Report and twelve volumes of appendices on each assassination were published by the Congress. In the JFK case, the HSCA found that there was a “probable conspiracy,” though it was unable to determine the nature of that conspiracy or its other participants (besides Oswald). This finding was based in part on acoustics evidence from a tape purported to record the shots, but was also based on other evidence including an investigation of Ruby’s mafia connections and potential CIA and/or FBI connections to Oswald. To this day, many conspiracy deniers are unaware that the Congressional investigation into JFK’s assassination concluded beyond any shadow of a doubt that it was a conspiracy. What made them come to this conclusion? Aside from reading the report, many witnesses (some of whom were CIA agents and station chiefs in Dallas that morning) were killed the night before testifying. For example, George de Mohrenschildt was a petroleum geologist who befriended Lee Harvey Oswald during the months preceding the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy. He also worked for the CIA. He also blew his brains out the night before he was to testify to the committee. The committee also uncovered, among many things, that Oswald left the marines where he learned how to speak fluent Russian (at the height of the cold war). He was given money by the State Department to travel to Russia where he stopped off in Japan at a top secret US Military facility. The Warren Commission even mentioned this part. What most people do not know is that he probably was working in the Cold War infiltrating the Russians as either a “dangle,” “double agent,” or “defector” of some kind. What is interesting is that upon his return he got more money from the State Department to buy a house and work with an ex FBI Chief and CIA officials in training anti-Castro Cubans for an invasion. In Louisiana, where he was working, the CIA was involved in Operation Mongoose, Where Oswald worked under CIA Agent David Ferrie, who killed himself before testifying in a trial on the Assassination as well. Operation Mongoose worked closely with Southern Mafia figures largely because the casinos in Cuba, which were shut down after Fidel obtained control over the country, were epicenters for control on the island. The CIA even hired the mafia to assassinate Fidel on many occasions, 3 attempts which failed are common knowledge. What is funny is that figures who worked very close with Oswald either ended up dead (over 100 of them connected to the assassination died within a few years of unusual circumstances) or they ended up in other conspiracies.
24.
1919 World Series Conspiracy: The 1919 World Series (often referred to as the Black Sox Scandal) resulted in the most famous scandal in baseball history. Eight players from the Chicago White Sox (nicknamed the Black Sox) were accused of throwing the series against the Cincinnati Reds. Details of the scandal remain controversial, and the extent to which each player was involved varied. It was, however, front-page news across the country when the story was uncovered late in the 1920 season, and despite being acquitted of criminal charges (throwing baseball games was technically not a crime), the eight players were banned from organized baseball (i.e. the leagues subject to the National Agreement) for life. There are hundreds of other conspiracies involving throwing games, sporting matches and large scale entertainment events. It is common knowledge for many, this list would have to go into the thousands if we included all of them.
25.
Karen Silkwood: Karen was an American labor union activist and chemical technician at the Kerr-McGee plant near Crescent, Oklahoma, United States. Silkwood’s job was making plutonium pellets for nuclear reactor fuel rods. After being hired at Kerr-McGee, Silkwood joined the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Union local and took part in a strike at the plant. After the strike ended, she was elected to the union’s bargaining committee and assigned to investigate health and safety issues. She discovered what she believed to be numerous violations of health regulations, including exposure of workers to contamination, faulty respiratory equipment and improper storage of samples. She also believed the lack of sufficient shower facilities could increase the risk of employee contamination. In the summer of 1974, Silkwood testified to the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) about these issues, alleging that safety standards had slipped because of a production speedup which resulted in employees being given tasks for which they were poorly trained. She also alleged that Kerr-McGee employees handled the fuel rods improperly and that the company falsified inspection records. On November 5, 1974, Silkwood performed a routine self-check and found almost 400 times the legal limit for plutonium contamination. She was decontaminated at the plant and sent home with a testing kit to collect urine and feces for further analysis. Oddly, though there was plutonium on the exterior surfaces (the ones she touched) of the gloves she had been using, the gloves did not have any holes.
This suggests the contamination did not come from inside the glove box, but from some other source, in other words, someone was trying to poison her. The next morning, as she headed to a union negotiation meeting, she again tested positive for plutonium. This was surprising because she had only performed paperwork duties that morning. She was given a more intense decontamination. The following day, November 7, 1974, as she entered the plant, she was found to be dangerously contaminated — even expelling contaminated air from her lungs. A health physics team accompanied her back to her home and found plutonium traces on several surfaces — especially in the bathroom and the refrigerator. The house was later stripped and decontaminated. Silkwood, her partner and housemate were sent to Los Alamos National Laboratory for in-depth testing to determine the extent of the contamination in their bodies. Later that evening, Silkwood’s body was found in her car, which had run off the road and struck a culvert. The car contained no documents. She was pronounced dead at the scene from a “classic, one-car sleeping-driver accident”.
26.
CIA Drug Smuggling in Arkansas: August 23, 1987, in a rural community just south of Little Rock, police officers murdered two teenage boys because they witnessed a police-protected drug drop. The drop was part of a drug smuggling operation based at a small airport in Mena, Arkansas. The Mena operation was set up in the early 1980′s by the notorious drug smuggler, Barry Seal. Facing prison after a drug conviction in Florida, Seal flew to Washington, D.C., where he put together a deal that allowed him to avoid prison by becoming an informant for the government. As a government informant against drug smugglers, Seal testified he worked for the CIA and the DEA. In one federal court case, he testified that his income from March 1984 to August 1985, was between $700,000 and $800,000. This period was AFTER making his deal with the government. Seal testified that nearly $600,000 of this came from smuggling drugs while working for — and with the permission of the DEA. In addition to his duties as an informant, Seal was used by CIA operatives to help finance the Nicaraguan Contras. The CIA connection to the Mena operation was undeniable when a cargo plane given to Seal by the CIA was shot down over Nicaragua with a load of weapons. In spite of the evidence, every investigator who has tried to expose the crimes of Mena has been professionally destroyed, and those involved in drug smuggling operations have received continued protection from state and federal authorities.
27.
Bohemian Grove: For years, many conspiracy theorists were saying that the rich and powerful met every year in the woods and worshiped a giant stone owl in an occult fashion. It turns out, ABC, CBS, NBC, and many other credible news agencies investigated this and found out, its true. It is said to be just all fun and games, like brotherhood style fraternity stuff.
28.
Operation Paperclip: Operation Paperclip was the code name for the 1945 Office of Strategic Services, Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency recruitment of German scientists from Nazi Germany to the U.S. after VE Day. President Truman authorized Operation Paperclip in August 1945; however he expressly ordered that anyone found “to have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazi militarism” would be excluded. These included Wernher von Braun, Arthur Rudolph and Hubertus Strughold, who were all officially on record as Nazis and listed as a “menace to the security of the Allied Forces.” All were cleared to work in the U.S. after having their backgrounds “bleached” by the military; false employment histories were provided, and their previous Nazi affiliations were expunged from the record. The paperclips that secured newly-minted background details to their personnel files gave the operation its name.
29.
The Round Table: British businessman Cecil Rhodes advocated the British Empire reannexing the United States of America and reforming itself into an “Imperial Federation” to bring about a hyperpower and lasting world peace. In his first will, of 1877, written at the age of 23, he expressed his wish to fund a secret society (known as the Society of the Elect) that would advance this goal: “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonization by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labor and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.”
Conspiracy theorists fear that the international bankers of financial capitalism are planning to eventually subvert the independence of the U.S. by subordinating national sovereignty to a strengthened Bank for International Settlements with the intent to “create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole”. In a 13 November 2007 interview with Canadian journalist Benjamin Fulford, Rockefeller countered: “I don’t think that I really feel that we need a world government. We need governments of the world that work together and collaborate. But, I can’t imagine that there would be any likelihood or even that it would be desirable to have a single government elected by the people of the world … There have been people, ever since I’ve had any kind of position in the world, who have accused me of being ruler of the world. I have to say that I think for the large part, I would have to decide to describe them as crackpots. It makes no sense whatsoever, and isn’t true, and won’t be true, and to raise it as a serious issue seems to me to be irresponsible.” Some American social critics, such as Laurence H. Shoup, argue that the Council on Foreign Relations is an “imperial brain trust”, which has, for decades, played a central behind-the-scenes role in shaping U.S. foreign policy choices for the post-WWII international order and the Cold War, by determining what options show up on the agenda and what options do not even make it to the table; while others, such as G. William Domhoff, argue that it is in fact a mere policy discussion forum, which provides the business input to U.S. foreign policy planning. The latter argue that it has nearly 3,000 members, far too many for secret plans to be kept within the group; all the council does is sponsor discussion groups, debates and speakers; and as far as being secretive, it issues annual reports and allows access to its historical archives.
30.
The Illuminati: The Order of the Illuminati was an Enlightenment-age secret society founded on May 1st, 1776, in Ingolstadt (Upper Bavaria), by Adam Weishaupt, who was the first lay professor of canon law at the University of Ingolstadt. The movement consisted of freethinkers, secularists, liberals, republicans and pro-feminists, recruited in the Masonic Lodges of Germany, who sought to promote perfectionism through mystery schools. As a result, in 1785, the order was infiltrated, broken and suppressed by the government agents of Charles Theodore, Elector of Bavaria, in his campaign to neutralize the threat of secret societies ever becoming hotbeds of conspiracies to overthrow the monarchy and state religion. In the late 18th century, reactionary conspiracy theorists, such as Scottish physicist John Robison and French Jesuit priest Augustin Barruel, began speculating that the Illuminati survived their suppression and became the masterminds behind the French Revolution and the Reign of Terror. The Illuminati were accused of being enlightened absolutists who were attempting to secretly orchestrate a world revolution in order to globalize the most radical ideals of the Enlightenment: anti-clericalism, anti-monarchism, and anti-patriarchalism. During the 19th century, fear of an Illuminati conspiracy was a real concern of European ruling classes, and their oppressive reactions to this unfounded fear provoked in 1848 the very revolutions they sought to prevent. Although many say that the Illuminati was disbanded and destroyed so long ago, it is well known that the Rothschild dynasty following the family’s involvement in the secret order in Bavaria received much attention for its major takeover of Europe’s central banks. The Rothschild dynasty owns roughly half of the world’s wealth and evidence suggests it has funded both sides of major wars, including the United States Civil War.
31.
The Trilateral Commission: The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973 at the initiative of David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations. In July 1972, Rockefeller called his first meeting, which was held at Rockefeller’s Pocantico compound in New York’s Hudson Valley. It was attended by about 250 individuals who were carefully selected and screened by Rockefeller and represented the very elite of finance and industry. Its first executive committee meeting was held in Tokyo in October 1973. The Trilateral Commission was officially initiated, holding biannual meetings. A Trilateral Commission Task Force Report, presented at the 1975 meeting in Kyoto, Japan, called An Outline for Remaking World Trade and Finance, said: “Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.” Another Commission document read: “The overriding goal is to make the world safe for interdependence by protecting the benefits which it provides for each country against external and internal threats which will constantly emerge from those willing to pay a price for more national autonomy. This may sometimes require slowing the pace at which interdependence proceeds, and checking some aspects of it. More frequently however, it will call for checking the intrusion of national government into the international exchange of both economic and non-economic goods.”
32.
Big Brother or the Shadow Government: It is also called the “Deep State” by Peter Dale Scott, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley. A shadow government is a “government-in-waiting” that remains in waiting with the intention of taking control of a government in response to some event. It turned out this was true on 9/11, when it was told to us by our mainstream media. For years, this was ridiculed as a silly, crazy conspiracy theory and, like the others listed here, turned out to be 100% true. It is also called the Continuity of Government. The Continuity of Government (COG) is the principle of establishing defined procedures that allow a government to continue its essential operations in case of nuclear war or other catastrophic event. Since the end of the cold war, the policies and procedures for the COG have been altered according to realistic threats of that time. These include but are not limited to a possible coup or overthrow by right wing terrorist groups, a terrorist attack in general, an assassination, and so on. Believe it or not the COG has been in effect since 2001. After 9/11, it went into action. Now here is the kicker, many of the figures in Iran Contra, the Watergate Scandal, the alleged conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy, and many others listed here are indeed members of the COG. This is its own conspiracy as well.
Conspiracy theories not withstanding, I'm having a hard time with this one. Science has been wrong as often as it has been right, a 'green' economy is moving in whether there are underlying motives or not, politics and weather don't mix anymore than politics and religion do. From my neck of the woods here's where I sit (and possibly Wendy and many of the rest of you as well).
It is March 12 and it's expected to snow 10 inches today. We've had 84 inches of snow, if we actually get 10 today, we'll have broken the record. It's been at or below zero more days than I can count in the last 5 months. Our communities have dumped more salt on the road than we usually use in 4 years.
The ice cover on the Great Lakes has not been this heavy in many many years. My husband who has been an ice fisherman since he could walk (he's 60 now) has NEVER seen ice this thick-so thick his ice auger will not break through and he must resort to 'spudding' the last few feet to water.
Global warming? I guess I'll have to reassess my opinion when/if spring gets here. (It was 50 degrees yesterday, tomorrow the low is expected to be 3. Hmmm do I wear sandals or boots today-don't ask the weatherman, scientist or politician just look out the window. I am beginning to feel like a momma bear after a long winter of hibernation.
Beatles save me please...here comes the sun, here comes the sun...little darling it's alright ;)
I think the issue is not the question of whether the weather is changing or not. Rather, it's a matter of whether the earth's climate is changing solely due to man's activities.
I've always been pro-environment and I feel that humans generally foul things up whenever we start messing around with nature. However, after looking carefully into this issue, I've completely changed my views about it.
There is evidence that all the planets in our solar system are heating up. Many people realize that the sun's activity has increased in recent years by way of solar flares and such, but few people draw any parallels between the sun and global warming. Odd.
Now I'm not saying that human activity isn't changing the environment -- clearly we've managed to pollute just about ecosystem on the planet -- but let's not lose sight of the real issue. Is the cause of the problem the incandescent light bulbs in billions of homes or is it the unconscionable burning of fossil fuels and butchering of rain forests by a handful of corporate interests?
As you mull over these questions, don't lose sight of the proposed solution -- carbon tax. While huge conglomerates continue pumping and dumping, fricking and fracking without consequence, the government wants to tax us just for exhaling.
Maybe someone should tell them that plants breathe in our CO2 and change it into oxygen, exhaling it back into the atmosphere. This symbiotic relationship between plants and animals has worked perfectly for millions of years. We live on a carbon-based planet, afterall!
While we're going down this rabbit hole, don't forget Agenda 21, which ultimately calls for the government to seize everyone's property, so that we can be stacked and packed into tiny enclaves (see the light blue spots on the map below) -- all in the name of preserving nature. The way things are going, who do you think will be granted access to these nature preserves?
Please also see my related post, http://www.gatheringspot.net/topic/general-discussion/global-warming-hoax
Noa, that list was really cool, thanks for sharing! I had never heard of Karen Silkwood, that was crazy. Also, I did not know the CIA sponsered the movie Animal Farm, I wonder why? The map is scary! Reforestation. I read a book by Glen Beck (not neccessary of fan of his, but the book was GREAT) called Agenda 21, it was a fictional dramatation of what would happen if Agenda 21 was taken literal in all aspets and came to be. Basically they are living in fema camp like compounds and the setting is one generation into it. I enjoyed it, you might too.