Judge, jury, and executioner: Have the police become a law unto themselves?
"Police are specialists in violence. They are armed, trained, and authorized to use force. With varying degrees of subtlety, this colors their every action. Like the possibility of arrest, the threat of violence is implicit in every police encounter. Violence, as well as the law, is what they represent." - Kristian Williams, activist and author
Living in a free society means not having to look over your shoulder to see whether the government is watching or fearing that a government agent might perpetuate violence upon you.
Unfortunately, as I detail in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, subjected as we are to government surveillance, body scanners, militarized police, roadside strip searches, SWAT team raids, drones, and other trappings of a police state, "we the people" do not live in a free society any longer.
Not only are we no longer a free people but we have become a fearful people, as well, helped along in large part by politicians eager to capitalize on our fears. As Julie Hanus writes for Utne: "Since the 1980s, society at large has bolted frantically from one panic to the next. Fear of crime reduced us to wrecks, but before long we were also howling about deadly diseases, drug abusers, online pedophiles, avian flu, teens gone wild, mad cows, anthrax, immigrants, environmental collapse, and - let us not forget - terrorists."
Now thanks to an increasingly militarized police force and police officers who shoot first and ask questions later, we've got one more fear to add to that growing list, and with good reason: fear of the police - local, state and federal agents.
Who wouldn't be afraid of police officers who go around shooting unarmed citizens, tasering women - young and old alike, and forcing law-abiding Americans to the ground at gunpoint?
Such was the case when a Missouri police officer shot and wounded an unarmed panhandler. Texas police, during a raid on a home where music was reportedly being played too loudly, repeatedly tasered a 54-year-old grandmother, kicking and punching other members of the household. A 20-year-old Florida woman who was tasered by a police officer while she was handcuffed ended up in a permanent vegetative state and eventually died. And then there was the homeless man who was shot and killed by Albuquerque police for squatting on public land.
If it were just a few "bad" cops terrorizing the citizenry, that would be one thing. But what we're dealing with is a nationwide epidemic of court-sanctioned police violence carried out against individuals posing little or no threat of violence, who are nevertheless subjected to such excessive police force as to end up maimed or killed.
For example, Ron Hillstrom was pacing in the parking lot of his apartment complex asking for help when four officers approached him, unleashed their tasers, and subdued him with electric shocks. When Hillstrom fell to the ground, another officer hit him with a flashlight. Hillstrom died soon thereafter.
Danny Cantu was recently awarded $105,000 after Dallas police rushed into his backyard, threw a flash bang grenade into his window, and broke into his home without warning. Cantu was thrown to the ground and beaten with his hands tied behind his back.
Denise Green is suing San Francisco police after a license plate reader misread her license plate, causing her to be pulled over by five police officers who pointed guns at her under the false belief that she was driving a stolen car. After being held at gunpoint on the ground, Green was handcuffed and her car searched before she was finally released.
The toll such incidents take on adults can be life-altering, but when such police brutality is perpetrated on young people, the end result is nothing less than complete indoctrination into becoming compliant citizens of a totalitarian state. The message is clear and chilling: any deviation from what is "allowed" will be punished severely.
Thus, when a 9-year-old Portland girl got into a fight at a youth club, instead of the incident being resolved by staff members and reported to her family, police showed up at her home, arrested the young girl, took her down to the station, fingerprinted her, and had her mug shot taken.
Similarly, when 13-year-old Kevens Jean Baptiste failed to follow a school bus driver's direction to keep the bus windows closed (Kevens, who suffers from asthma, opened the window after a fellow student sprayed perfume, causing him to cough and wheeze), he was handcuffed by police, removed from the bus, and while still handcuffed, had his legs swept out from under him by an officer, causing him to crash to the ground.
In Missouri, a 7-year-old child was handcuffed because he was allegedly upset about being teased by his classmates. The inconsolable child, who was screaming in class because of the taunting, was taken by the school's security officer to the principal's office and handcuffed until his father arrived at the school.
There might be some hope of reform if only this problem of police brutality were not so widespread and endemic, if the citizenry actually had some sway with their representatives, if communities actually had some say over how law enforcement agencies "police" their communities, if police unions did not have such a stranglehold over the oversight process, if the courts were more impartial and less inclined to blindly sanction the actions of the police, and if the federal government itself had not already coopted state and local police agencies in order to transform them into extensions of the military.
In the absence of any credible scenarios that would hold the police accountable to abiding by the rule of law - our U.S. Constitution - and respecting the citizenry's right to be treated with respect and dignity, the police have become a law unto themselves.
Clearly, the master-servant relationship upon which American government was based has now been reversed. Government agents in general, and the police in particular, now seem to believe they are the masters and we are the servants. It's definitely time to reestablish us, the American citizenry, as the masters of our government - even if it means showing the oppressors that we will no longer wear their chains.
Some Americans have already begun pushing back. In Albuquerque, New Mexico, for example, where police have been involved in 39 shootings since 2010 - with the most recent being a police shooting of an unarmed homeless man camped out in a public park - residents have begun engaging in nonviolent acts of civil disobedience to disrupt the normal functioning of the city government until the police department is brought under control. Community activists actually went so far as to storm a city council meeting and announce that they would be performing a citizens' arrest of the police chief, charging him with "harboring fugitives from justice at the Albuquerque police department" and "crimes against humanity."
This growing tension, seen in Albuquerque and felt throughout the country, is a tension between those who wield power on behalf of the government - the president, Congress, the courts, the military, the militarized police, the technocrats, the faceless unelected bureaucrats who blindly obey and carry out government directives, no matter how immoral or unjust, and the corporations - and those among the populace who are finally waking up to the mounting injustices, seething corruption and endless tyrannies that are transforming our country into a police state.
Where we go wrong is in painting our oppressors - whether it be the police, the courts, Congress, or the president - as absolutely evil and ourselves as powerless to resist.
Hannah Arendt, a Holocaust survivor who reported on the war crimes trial of Nazi Adolf Eichmann, a senior officer who organized Hitler's death camps, denounced Eichmann not because he was evil per se but because he was a bureaucrat who unquestioningly carried out orders that were immoral, inhumane and evil. This, Arendt concluded, was the banality of evil, the ability to engage in wrongdoing or turn a blind eye to it, without taking any responsibility for your actions or inactions.
Coincidentally, the same year that Arendt's book Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil was published, Martin Luther King Jr. penned his "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," in which he concludes that "the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to 'order' than to justice." As King points out, "We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was 'legal' and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was 'illegal.' It was 'illegal' to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler's Germany."
In other words, there comes a time when law and order are in direct opposition to justice.
This tension is at the heart of the issue over police brutality, carried out by individuals who may not themselves be evil but are merely following orders, marching in lockstep with a government machine that views us as less than human. So how does one achieve justice without resorting to violence, given that violence only leads to more violence? The only recourse left to us, as both King and Arendt recognize, is mass civil disobedience of the nonviolent sort. As King notes:
[T]here is nothing new about this kind of civil disobedience. It was evidenced sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks rather than submit to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire. To a degree, academic freedom is a reality today because Socrates practiced civil disobedience. In our own nation, the Boston Tea Party represented a massive act of civil disobedience.
After all, as King declared, "Freedom is never voluntarily given up by the oppressor; it must be demanded."
Whatever police officers once were is a far cry from the militerized version we have today. I hope that they wake up soon and realize who they are really serving and protecting. ~ Noa
I have to vocalize that there are still good police officers out there, though I agree we are seeing many at their worst on a daily basis. I know some really good people, with high ideals and strong moral values who genuinely are in the field they are in to help not hurt people and do their utmost to maintain that as their standard. In all things, I think when we begin to stereotype ALL individuals based on the actions of some, we tread upon dangerous ground.
The sad thing to me is that when officers (or anyone else) cross the line from serving and protecting to becoming agents of harm to innocents and engage in what can only be seen as criminal behaviour, too often our justice system seems to turn a blind eye and treat them differently than those they purportedly are there to 'serve'. We see this in cases of celebrity wrongdoing, political scandalous behavior and many other areas as well.
As a race, ONE race (human), I wonder why it is so difficult for us to learn that 'power' is not about who can be the most violent and cause the most harm. To me, true power is found in one who realizes that we have no need to wield it against another and finds another way.
Police, and all of us need to become specialists in how to avoid and diffuse conflict and find peaceful resolution rather than contributing to the chaos. We also need to remember all is not always as it seems at first glance. It would serve us all well to step back for a moment when confronted with situations and people that incite fear or hatred within us and think of other ways to act (not just re-act).
Another point I have to make is police officers are trying to make a living just like everyone else. Most don't go into it because they are masochistic jerks out to hurt people. In Detroit, a brand new officer makes about $13 bucks an hour. I'm surprised there is even a police force here with a pay scale like that. I wouldn't risk my life everyday to that end regardless of my motivation to take the job.
No, I'm not turning a blind eye to what we're seeing in the media or saying it's ok that force is wielded in this way. I'm not sticking my head in the sand and pretending I don't see it. I'm saying we can do better...so why aren't we? As to being accepting of living in a police state, I don't think any sane individual wants or supports that so I guess I have to ask 'whatcha gonna do about it'?
Peace Peace Peace (I seem to be saying that alot lately) Love kristyne
I agree with Kristyne that there are still some good-hearted, well-meaning people within the police force, but I would wager that they are becoming a minority. Some of the good guys have left because the system is so corrupt. I've personally met some of these fine folks, but more often I've encountered the facist types who wield their authority with little foresight. I have had more than one brush with an unreasonable cop simply because I was in the wrong place at the wrong time. I don't mean to stereotype the entire profession.
My point is that that the general makeup of the organization is changing, and it's not by accident. Just as precincts are becoming more equipped with military weapons, so the profile of the person they employ is equally more aggressive. Often their ranks come from traumatized veterans. Just look at how often a woman or an old person is body slammed or tazored by several cops without provocation. These aren't just my thoughts, these are observations made by career police officers.
It's no secret that the United States government is preparing for martial law. Although it's nice to think that there are still some good guys left on the force, I wouldn't play the odds. I think we'd all do well to be cautious around law enforcement these days.
As for your comment Kristyne, "As a race, ONE race (human), I wonder why it is so difficult for us to learn that 'power' is not about who can be the most violent and cause the most harm. To me, true power is found in one who realizes that we have no need to wield it against another and finds another way." I think it's a matter of training. Police officers are taught to blindly obey orders and in return demand unquestioned, obedience to authority from the public. Like you said, they're just doing their jobs.
But in a free society, a day must come when those working within law enforcement question a system that does so little to serve justice.