Whoo Hoo!!!

I'm sending Jeff's post here to the top of the list for a little longer exposure before it gets lost in the past.  I listened to all three of these interview segments and found them to be fascinating and supremely hopeful.  What I'm a bit gun-shy of is my own strong desire to believe in the authenticity and honorability of The Plan; am I ignoring things I should be questioning?  (The Plan, revealed to Drake in about 1979, has been developing secretly since by the white hats in the military: a comprehensive action to take back our country for us and restore our Republic and Constitution back to where it was in 1812 -- as well as make sweeping arrests of significant evildoers and release free-energy and energetic-healing technologies -- and much more.  The story of how this will happen is compelling). 

So.... a couple of points that occur to me:  Drake says that 80 -- 90% of the military is not willing to break their oat to defend the Constitution by taking any military action against civilians.  How can he know that?  A significant percentage of our volunteer military services are poorly educated and probably haven't even thought about the oath or remembered they ever took it.   Also, what are the chances that this is major disinformation fed to Wilcock to lull us to sleep regarding a negative military takover?  Wilcock addresses this last concern in the interview, but it remains a question for me.  Wilcock is very intelligent and I respect his effort, dedication, and work.  But, to my sensibility, he also has a credulous streak, in addition to having a big blind spot where his arrogance resides.

Still, I'm hopeful that this is the truth.  It would make sense that we would need a force as powerful and as connected to as many aspects of our socio-economic system as the military (with the police) in order to expel this deeply-rooted cancer from our collective experience here and clear the way for the next stage of our evolution to actually unfold.  And Wilcock does put The Plan into perspective in the big picture (including the ET and Terrestrial human evolution levels). Of course, I love that.

So Wendy, I hope we'll all be going "Woo Hoo!!" later this year, and not "Boo Hoo!!"

Got pretty much the same feelings & thoughts, ranging from delightful romantic notions of high hopes in this very intriguing message to nagging concerns about the credibility of such a fanciful and amazing message (we've heard so many of these hopeful messages in the past that come to nothing).

While in the throes of this delightful feeling of hopefulness for the "grand opening" of a new metaparadigm it occurred to me that (or maybe frame this thought in the "what if" category) it is remotely possible that the primary reason for NDAA to be secured and finalized "legally" recently is for this very reason, the execution of "the plan" by in-the-know insiders making a brilliant chess move.

It would be so cool that all the warmonger hawks would be so easily going along with NDAA for the reasons they see as essential for maintaining their geopolitical strategy of an old & fading paradigm, while the real reason of the Obama administration (or at least the inner circle of this administration in cooperation with key personnel in the Joint Chiefs & others) is to be as prepared as possible for any and all contingencies prior to the smooth and well-orchestrated execution of "the plan"...

I would so love to see the real-life manifestation of this being the real reason for NDAA...

I agree as well.  I was thinking about all of these seemingly nefarious laws being snuck in, and think maybe they are for the good - just as the NDAA could be.  I can't help but hold fast to the idea that Obama seems like one of the good guys.  (That's not to say that he doesn't have faults and failings... just that he appears to have a good heart). 

I just keep seeing these high level bankers and such retiring / resigning, and see it as a hopeful sign.  For what it's worth (I read them, but some people don't pay any attention), nearly all the channellers are giving the same story as we hear from Wilcock.  Maybe it is ours to create.  :)

Lots of love,

Kathy

I used to have contact with a 9/11 truther who was really into deep politics. He wasn't just an internet researcher. When a new 9/11 truth book came out he would look the author up and have a long phone conversation with them. He was able to get a lot of inside information that way. He warned me about the real estate bubble collapse months before there was anything about it on Alex Jones or the other internet sites I visit. He also told me years ago that Stubblebine and a lot of the retired military generals knew 9/11 was an inside job, were concerned about it, and had plans to take the country back from George Bush. Well here we are almost a decade later and nothing has happened yet but I got to thinking how one would execute such a plan when you only had a few trusted people at the top levels, as well as many who were unkowns and others that appear to be loyal to the bad guys. If you couldn't get rid of a corrupt general, you'ld have to get trusted people in below his level, that would be willing to dis-obey his orders. These kinds of plans take a long time to fulfill if you want to avoid a civil war among the military, with half following some generals and fighting the other half of the generals. So I could imagine that they have just finally got their act together where they are comfortable that they have enough trusted people in the right places.

I also think that the idea that the military had a huge thick book of plans to deal with a threat from within is very believable - I'd have a hard time believing they didn't have plans for this scenario since the 40's (I think) when Smedley Butler exposed the plan to take over during his day.

Here's more thoughts about this from Kerry Casidy's blog:

VIVA LA REVOLUTION!

This is a link to listen to David's recent interview with an American Patriot named "Drake" -- not his real name... who is involved in a group that believes they have the means to organize the US military to take back the U.S. and revert back to the US Constitution from the 1800s just after the signing of the 13th Amendment.

I believe is going to be attempted but not the way they think...  From what I know of the many patriot movements within the U.S. including the White Hats from this site:  http://tdarkcabal.blogspot.com/ ordering arrests is far easier said than done.  And the kind of coordination required to mount such an effort will require some very sophisticated alignments and organization.... which begs the question under what group (who are not the cabal we all know and revile) will such a coordinated effort happen?

While I applaud any revolution that wishes to clean up this mess called the United States, I do not see the military operating in unison and turning against its masters without a fair amount of bloodshed.  It seems the Secret Gov and Space Command who are really running the place are viewed as losing their grip.  I cannot see this group, worldwide and off planet being dealt with so easily as is described here.  

I do think REVOLUTION is inevitable, at least here in the U.S.   And I do hope this is one of many beginnings.  But we have a long way to go before the dark cabal simply hands over their scaler/particle beam weapons, skynet robotic army of androids, command and control of the Mars and Moon colonies and Phobos and their plans for humanity 2.0.  Do you really think they will relinquish their hold on this planet so easily?  It is naive at best to think that the U.S. is not running the Secret Space Program.  

Drake is painting a country that can supposedly close its borders and clean house when the very command and control of the off world civilization they have built is orchestrated from here.  Underground too, cannot be ignored.  The bases are vast and incredibly high tech... do you really think they will just hand them over?  Yes there is rebellion in our military.  But it is going to take a coup de grâce AND A coup d'état before there will be a changing of the guard...  What Drake is describing and not willing to admit to is a coup d'état.

It happened with the death of Kennedy and appears on the verge of happening again...

From way down here in New Zealand. I sit and send my Love and Light Angels to you all in the U.S.A.

I have not heard the latest interviews, or yet had time to read the latest updates on Wilcock's site

This information is coming to us all from "credible sources & high ranking officials" (are they though), unfortunetly I neither have the time, nor the knowledge to try and check there validity.

The posts on this subject, or those closely related, that come up here at our gathering are usually very long, and at the moment I just do not have the time available to read them through. So all I can do is hold in my heart, the feeling of a peaceful resolve to this all, for your once great country.

A recent shining example:

Icelandic Anger Brings Debt Forgiveness in Best Recovery Story

February 28, 2012, 8:03 AM EST

Source of story here.

By Omar R. Valdimarsson

Feb. 20 (Bloomberg) -- Icelanders who pelted parliament with rocks in 2009 demanding their leaders and bankers answer for the country’s economic and financial collapse are reaping the benefits of their anger.

Since the end of 2008, the island’s banks have forgiven loans equivalent to 13 percent of gross domestic product, easing the debt burdens of more than a quarter of the population, according to a report published this month by the Icelandic Financial Services Association.

“You could safely say that Iceland holds the world record in household debt relief,” said Lars Christensen, chief emerging markets economist at Danske Bank A/S in Copenhagen. “Iceland followed the textbook example of what is required in a crisis. Any economist would agree with that.”

The island’s steps to resurrect itself since 2008, when its banks defaulted on $85 billion, are proving effective. Iceland’s economy will this year outgrow the euro area and the developed world on average, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development estimates. It costs about the same to insure against an Icelandic default as it does to guard against a credit event in Belgium. Most polls now show Icelanders don’t want to join the European Union, where the debt crisis is in its third year.

The island’s households were helped by an agreement between the government and the banks, which are still partly controlled by the state, to forgive debt exceeding 110 percent of home values. On top of that, a Supreme Court ruling in June 2010 found loans indexed to foreign currencies were illegal, meaning households no longer need to cover krona losses.

Crisis Lessons

“The lesson to be learned from Iceland’s crisis is that if other countries think it’s necessary to write down debts, they should look at how successful the 110 percent agreement was here,” said Thorolfur Matthiasson, an economics professor at the University of Iceland in Reykjavik, in an interview. “It’s the broadest agreement that’s been undertaken.”

Without the relief, homeowners would have buckled under the weight of their loans after the ratio of debt to incomes surged to 240 percent in 2008, Matthiasson said.

Iceland’s $13 billion economy, which shrank 6.7 percent in 2009, grew 2.9 percent last year and will expand 2.4 percent this year and next, the Paris-based OECD estimates. The euro area will grow 0.2 percent this year and the OECD area will expand 1.6 percent, according to November estimates.

Housing, measured as a subcomponent in the consumer price index, is now only about 3 percent below values in September 2008, just before the collapse. Fitch Ratings last week raised Iceland to investment grade, with a stable outlook, and said the island’s “unorthodox crisis policy response has succeeded.”

People Vs Markets

Iceland’s approach to dealing with the meltdown has put the needs of its population ahead of the markets at every turn.

Once it became clear back in October 2008 that the island’s banks were beyond saving, the government stepped in, ring-fenced the domestic accounts, and left international creditors in the lurch. The central bank imposed capital controls to halt the ensuing sell-off of the krona and new state-controlled banks were created from the remnants of the lenders that failed.

Activists say the banks should go even further in their debt relief. Andrea J. Olafsdottir, chairman of the Icelandic Homes Coalition, said she doubts the numbers provided by the banks are reliable.

“There are indications that some of the financial institutions in question haven’t lost a penny with the measures that they’ve undertaken,” she said.

Fresh Demands

According to Kristjan Kristjansson, a spokesman for Landsbankinn hf, the amount written off by the banks is probably larger than the 196.4 billion kronur ($1.6 billion) that the Financial Services Association estimates, since that figure only includes debt relief required by the courts or the government.

“There are still a lot of people facing difficulties; at the same time there are a lot of people doing fine,” Kristjansson said. “It’s nearly impossible to say when enough is enough; alongside every measure that is taken, there are fresh demands for further action.”

As a precursor to the global Occupy Wall Street movement and austerity protests across Europe, Icelanders took to the streets after the economic collapse in 2008. Protests escalated in early 2009, forcing police to use teargas to disperse crowds throwing rocks at parliament and the offices of then Prime Minister Geir Haarde. Parliament is still deciding whether to press ahead with an indictment that was brought against him in September 2009 for his role in the crisis.

A new coalition, led by Social Democrat Prime Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir, was voted into office in early 2009. The authorities are now investigating most of the main protagonists of the banking meltdown.

Legal Aftermath

Iceland’s special prosecutor has said it may indict as many as 90 people, while more than 200, including the former chief executives at the three biggest banks, face criminal charges.

Larus Welding, the former CEO of Glitnir Bank hf, once Iceland’s second biggest, was indicted in December for granting illegal loans and is now waiting to stand trial. The former CEO of Landsbanki Islands hf, Sigurjon Arnason, has endured stints of solitary confinement as his criminal investigation continues.

That compares with the U.S., where no top bank executives have faced criminal prosecution for their roles in the subprime mortgage meltdown. The Securities and Exchange Commission said last year it had sanctioned 39 senior officers for conduct related to the housing market meltdown.

The U.S. subprime crisis sent home prices plunging 33 percent from a 2006 peak. While households there don’t face the same degree of debt relief as that pushed through in Iceland, President Barack Obama this month proposed plans to expand loan modifications, including some principal reductions.

According to Christensen at Danske Bank, “the bottom line is that if households are insolvent, then the banks just have to go along with it, regardless of the interests of the banks.”

--Editors: Jonas Bergman, Tasneem Brogger.

To contact the reporter on this story: Omar R. Valdimarsson in Reykjavik [email protected].

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jonas Bergman at [email protected]

I think Wendy's and Kerry Cassidy's assessments are realistic.  It's fairly obvious that the PTW are getting desperate to maintain their grip on humanity.  (Referring to recent extreme legislation and far-fetched news releases about controversial topics... for example: NDAA and Osama Bin Laden's "execution.")  I think we're in for a rough ride, but with a happy ending, ultimately.

I can't help getting a little excited and hopeful hearing about these mass arrests, unground bunker bombings, and about hundreds of countries bucking the 'system'.  Maybe that's just my wishful thinking, I dunno. 

But, I refuse to believe the 'new world order' into existence.  I have to believe that our Divine Creator, benevolent ETs, or we-the-people won't allow world domination, enslavement, and artifically induced planetary destruction.  Add to this the particular time and place in the galaxy that our Earth (and her inhabitants) are now traversing, and I think there is every reason to hope that the "times they are a changin' " for the good of all.

if anyone's still following this.  Haven't listened to it yet, but plan to soon:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomizerradio/2012/04/08/freedom-reigns