https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdP95oSoOFk
Hi Fred-
I have to admit I skipped reading your 9/11 post via e-mail so sorry to everyone if Fred already sent this around. This is very NEW
information - I had even heard Rebecca Roth give interviews before but this is new stuff from even her interviews from a few weeks ago.
Most excellent interview, Wendy!!! I learned a lot of new things, which is rare these days. I'll be sharing this with our email list. Thanks so much!!!
With much love and warm wishes,
Fred
iddo-day on the mucho excellent aye!!!
always suspected some form of operation northwoods type of operation as pertains to where they flew and landed the real flights and what they may have done with the people other than the handlers in on the false flag op.... if indeed there was anyone on the real flights that was not in on the op from the beginning.
Operation Northwoods - Operation Northwoods.pdf
I knew it was a conspiracy but I had no idea how 9-11 was put together or orchestrated at the highest levels. I'll be adding a couple of books to my reading list.
Glad you guys liked it and I wasn't repeating something that was already sent out.
There is some confusion in her interviews about which airforce base she is talking about that I'd thought I'd mention since I live here in Massacusetts. One interview I think she says Otis airforce base which is on the Cape near Falmouth, MA. Another interview she mentions Otis, MA which is a town in western MA and the nearest known airforce base is Westover airforce base but that is 20-30 miles east of Otis.
She mentions that her witness saw the planes flying very low like they were less than a mile away from landing and to the north. There isn't any known airforce base or air strip north of Otis, MA that I could find. I looked on google earth and there are some flat places.
It makes sense that they would land in a place like Otis, MA which is really out in the middle of nowhere and very sparsely populated. Landing on the Cape, would have meant tons of witnesses that I think would have come forward by now.
As usual, whenever new theories about 9/11 come up, there is strife. Jim Fetzer is having difficulties with Rebecca. Hopefully this will all get worked out in a little while.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIfcUgMEAnM&index=3&list=PLsfS5KpYMzb20sCxyfSotfX1ELkIBrXZ3
I'm wondering like Chris does about the people on the original flights. So they flew these planes to bases? Did they execute them on the ground? Were they CIA personnel or other conspirators? Really crazy this stuff! It makes my head hurt to consider the 'reality' of public life is based on such profound and evil deception by so few against so many. I am feeling my victim emotions starting up again. Better take a break...
In Canada, we're in the midst of a federal election, and we've had about 15 candidates step down from the ballot over controversial comments they made while on the campaign trail, but more common, comments they made years ago on Facebook. It's disgusting the level to which lives are being destroyed lately over Comments taken out of context. Sure, some of them may be bigoted or stupid things to say, but people don't deserve to be harassed, threatened, and hung up to dry over it.
But I digress. One of these candidates stepped down over comments she made years ago questioning 9/11.
http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/canada/british-columbia/canada-election-2015-li...
http://www.cbc.ca/m/news/politics/canada-election-2015-liberal-facebook-...
Look at how quickly her tune had changed:
"I want to be extremely clear. I do not question any aspects of what occurred during the tragic events on September 11th, 2001. Let there be no doubt about it,"
And another candidate with a similar change of tune:
"As I lost a good friend, Christoffer Carstanjen, on Sept. 11, my comments reflect a yearning to have closure and see the footage of the multiple attacks which took place on that day. Let's be crystal clear: I have never and do not question the events which took place on Sept. 11, 2001," he told CBC News.
and the cover up team is shouting "YES!" and slapping high fives in their hidey hole. The indoctrination of the public and media is established.
I find this grotesque and I feel so hopeless. When the past is an unquestioned lie, what kind of future will we inherit? I think my greatest frustration is how my fellow average man is fooled and so I conclude it won't get any better. For instance I trust scientists saying we have little time to stop the worst effects of global warming and so i believe we need consensus to take action on a large scale to save our own lives and save our children's future. How can we agree if facts are overridden by belief? I'm tired of this new distrust of science that denies basic science like evolution(like God isn't clever enough to exist without being the God of the Old Estimate). Or that politicians in my state create laws to deny projected sea level rise so their developer pals can build in risky areas of the coast line. The theme is "Deny what disturbs your beliefs or inhibits your greed" and it is a threat to our survival. What other species has subgroups that can make decisions that deny reality for the whole species? None. There are no other species doing this and I think we must be drunk with our heretofore exploding numbers. "Do You See? If we can be 7 billion-how can we be wrong?"
It's an oldie but a goodie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgrunnLcG9Q
Good one, Noa. Thanks!!!
Termites produce more Co2 than humans.
http://www.nytimes.com/1982/10/31/us/termite-gas-exceeds-smokestack-pollution.html
I ordered David Ray Griffin's book on climate change from the interlibrary loan but I haven't recieved it yet. I intend to read it and I'll let you know if any of my attitudes change. Science is wonderful when it's real science - always going with the evidence - that's what it'a all about. History of science shows that people who claim to be scientists have not gone with the evidence though. It does have a better track record than religion in many areas though.
Contrary to mainstream media lies, there is not a "concensus" about global warming. But scientists who don't support the global warming scam risk losing their research funding for disagreeing with the status quo. Nonetheless, thousands of scientists have come forward to buck the popular theory that global warming is caused by humans.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2012/07/17/that-scientific-global-warming-consensus-not/
"Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists."
Science is based upon "theory," and these days, test results that don't support the theory are often discarded.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXKhvK3AHc0
Thanks Noa,
This video is excellent and I'm so glad that it clearly talks about the Israeli involvement without being anti-Jewish. When people first started talking about this information it was so mixed with anti-Jewish statements that I was unwilling to listen.
It is depressing that there is not a single candidate running for president now that hasn't pledged fidelity to Israel. Obviously our government has been corrupted by an agenda that has nothing to do with benefitting the American people.